نمونه رایتینگ آیلتس

Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

It is true that some minority languages may disappear in the near future. Although it can be argued that governments could save money by allowing this to happen, I believe that these languages should be protected and preserved.

There are several reasons why saving minority languages could be seen as a waste of money. Firstly, if a language is only spoken by a small number of people, expensive education programs will be needed to make sure that more people learn it, and the state will have to pay for facilities, teachers and marketing. This money might be better spent on other public services. Secondly, it would be much cheaper and more efficient for countries to have just one language. Governments could cut all kinds of costs related to communicating with each minority group.

Despite the above arguments, I believe that governments should try to preserve languages that are less widely spoken. A language is much more than simply a means of communication; it has a vital connection with the cultural identity of the people who speak it. If a language disappears, a whole way of life will disappear with it, and we will lose the rich cultural diversity that makes societies more interesting. By spending money to protect minority languages, governments can also preserve traditions, customs and behaviours that are part of a country’s history.

In conclusion, it may save money in the short term if we allow minority languages to disappear, but in the long term this would have an extremely negative impact on our cultural heritage.(258 words)

برای دیدن مطالب بیشتر کافیست کلیک کنید

نمونه سوالات آیلتس آکادمیک ژوئن ۲۰۱۷ کویت

Reading test

Passage 1. About wind power and ways to harness it.

Passage 2. About human navigation.

Passage 3. About climate change discovery on a certain island in the Pacific region.

Writing test

Writing task 1 (a report)

We were given two maps of a museum and its surroundings, in 1957 and 2007. We had to notice and describe the changes.

Writing task 2 (an essay)

Many studies say that older people do not exercise enough. What are the reasons for this? What would you suggest to encourage them to exercise?

Speaking test

Interview

• What is your full name?
• Can I see your ID?
• Where are you from?
• Do you work or study?
• What do you do?
• What do you like about your job?
• What do you think about advertisements?
• Do you buy products because of the ads?
• What do you think about billboard advertisements?

Cue Card

Describe a happily married couple that you know. Please say

• Who are they?
• How long have you known them?
• What makes this married couple happy?

Discussion

• What do they do together?
• How often do you see them?
• Let’s talk about weddings.
• How do people celebrate weddings in your country?
• What is the average age to get married in your country?
• Why do people get married at a later age today?
• Why do people tend to have fewer children now than in the past?

برای دیدن مطالب بیشتر کافیست کلیک کنید

نمونه رایتینگ آیلتس

Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

It is sometimes argued that tourists from overseas should be charged more than local residents to visit important sites and monuments. I completely disagree with this idea.

The argument in favor of higher prices for foreign tourists would be that cultural or historical attractions often depend on state subsidies to keep them going, which means that the resident population already pays money to these sites through the tax system. However, I believe this to be a very shortsighted view. Foreign tourists contribute to the economy of the host country with the money they spend on a wide range of goods and services, including food, souvenirs, accommodation and travel. The governments and inhabitants of every country should be happy to subsidies important tourist sites and encourage people from the rest of the world to visit them.

If travelers realized that they would have to pay more to visit historical and cultural attractions in a particular nation, they would perhaps decide not to go to that country on holiday. To take the UK as an example, the tourism industry and many related jobs rely on visitors coming to the country to see places like Windsor Castle or Saint Paul’s Cathedral. These two sites charge the same price regardless of nationality, and this helps to promote the nation’s cultural heritage. If overseas tourists stopped coming due to higher prices, there would be a risk of insufficient funding for the maintenance of these important buildings.

In conclusion, I believe that every effort should be made to attract tourists from overseas, and it would be counterproductive to make them pay more than local residents.(269 words, band 9)

برای دیدن مطالب بیشتر کافیست کلیک کنید

سوالات آیلتس اسپیکینگ می ۲۰۱۷ ازبکستان

Speaking test

Interview

    What is your name?
    Where are you from?
    Can I see your ID?
    Do you work or study?
    Describe the place where you live.
    Is it easy to get there?
    What kind of transportation do you use?
    What kind of shoes do you prefer: fashionable or comfortable?
    Is it good to have a lot of shoes?

Cue Card

Talk about an occasion on which you had to try a new activity for the first time.

Please say

    What kind of activity was it?
    Where did it happen?
    Why did it happen?
    Explain what you learn from that experience.

Discussion

    Why do people try dangerous sports?
    Do people in your country try these sports?
    Should they think about their families?
  What can be done to replace dangerous sports with some other activities 

برای دیدن مطالب بیشتر کافیست کلیک کنید

نمونه سوالات رایتینگ آیلتس

Although more and more people read news on the Internet, newspapers will remain the most important source of news. Do you agree or disagree?

The Internet is beginning to rival newspapers as the best place to find information about what is happening in the world. I believe that this trend will continue, and the Internet will soon be just as important as the traditional press.

On the one hand, I believe that newspapers will continue to be a vital source of information, even in the Internet age. Firstly, newspapers are the most traditional means of communicating the news, and not everyone wants to or is able to use the Internet instead. For example, old people or those in rural areas might not have the ability or opportunity to get online, while many of us simply prefer newspapers even if we do have Internet access. Secondly, newspapers can be trusted as reliable sources of news because they employ professional journalists and editors. Finally, many people like the experience of holding and reading a paper rather than looking at a computer screen.

However, the Internet is likely to become just as popular as newspapers for a variety of reasons. The main reason is that it allows us much faster access to news in real time and wherever we are, on different gadgets and mobile devices. Another key benefit of online news compared to newspapers is the ability to share articles, discuss them with other people, give our views, and even contribute with our own updates on social media. For example, there has been an explosion in the use of platforms like Twitter and YouTube where anyone can share their news and views. A final point is that this source of news is less damaging to the environment.

In conclusion, I disagree with the view that newspapers will continue to be the main source of news, because I believe that the Internet will soon be equally important.

برای دیدن مطالب بیشتر کافیست کلیک کنید